Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • etal
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 23

    Tumor-only variant calling

    I'm attempting to call SNVs in tumor samples without a paired normal sample. Some of these tumor samples can have low purity, so the allelic frequency of somatic variants is much lower than the .5 expected for germline SNPs. FreeBayes in particular gives these variants an extremely low quality score, even with the --pooled-continuous model, making it difficult to usefully filter the resulting VCF.

    Does anyone know of a good SNV caller designed for single tumor samples? Foundation Medicine claims to have built one, but did not release it publicly.

    Failing that: Can I fudge FreeBayes' --ploidy or --cnv-map arguments based on known tumor purity so that it will model any fully clonal somatic SNVs properly?

    This workflow looks like:
    1. Infer copy number segments from mapped reads (CNVkit).
    2. Infer tumor purity from segments (THetA).
    3. Compute fake tumor-cell ploidy = (2 / tumor_purity). Example: sample is 20% tumor cells; a somatic, heterozygous SNV that is fully clonal in the tumor cells would have allele frequency .1, so fake ploidy is 10.
    4. Rescale CNV values to fake ploidy, so neutral copy number is the fake ploidy value (e.g. 10). Round to integers.
    5. Run FreeBayes with --cnv-map = rescaled CNVs. (Also --pooled-discrete, I suppose.)


    Would this allow FreeBayes to accurately call somatic variants with appropriate quality scores?

    Could the same be done with GATK UnifiedGenotyper or HaplotypeCaller, or samtools?
  • etal
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 23

    #2
    Mentioned in another thread:

    Originally posted by SNPsaurus View Post
    You might try LoFreq for calling rarer variants:
    Download LoFreq for free. Fast and sensitive variant-calling from sequencing data. None

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23066108
    I think this is the sort of variant caller I was looking for.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    96 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    117 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    109 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...