Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aggp11
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 87

    DESeq2 for targeted RNA-Seq

    Hi,

    We plan to run some targeted whole transcriptome rna-seq using the AmpliSeq RNA methodology currently being sold by Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher. As a background on the technique, LT has designed 100-200bp probes for >20,800 features from RefSeq and provide that as a tool to study gene level differential expression. You can find more information here:



    I have been using DESeq2 for our whole transcriptome sequencing data and am wondering if DESeq2 will work for this targeted approach. I am reading/trying to understand more about the Math behind DESeq2 and on the surface it seems that DESeq2 should work fine because if I understand it correctly,"gene length" doesn't necessarily factor in the sizefactor based feature level normalization (unlike RPKM/FPKM, which in this case can be replaced by RPM/FPM). However, I am curious to know if I am overlooking something that might affect how DESeq2 would behave for such an experimental design.

    I'll appreciate any insights on this.

    Thank you!
  • Wolfgang Huber
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 109

    #2
    Dear AGGP11,

    there is no fundamental reason why DESeq2 should not work with data from such an approach. As you say, the crucial assumption is that the number of reads for a gene is (to good enough approximation) proportional to its abundance, and that the proportionality factor -whatever it is- does not change between samples. So I'd make some exploratory plots to check whether this seems to be true for the data at hand.

    Wolfgang
    Wolfgang Huber
    EMBL

    Comment

    • aggp11
      Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 87

      #3
      Dear Wolfgang,

      Thank you for the response.

      Praful

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...