Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TopHat SAM - Expressing Paired End Multi-reads

    Hi,

    I've been struggling to understand exactly how TopHat represents multi-reads in its output SAM file, especially in the context of paired end reads. I've done some background reading, but I haven't been able to clear things up - somefully someone can help.

    Let's say TopHat is considering a pair with ends A and B, and it finds two alignment combinations that make sense (i.e. where both ends map to opposite strands of the same chromosome, at an expected distance apart):

    A->P1
    B->P2

    A->P3
    B->P4

    How are these represented in the SAM? The way I understand it at the moment, there will be 4 lines in the SAM, one for each alignment. However, I can't see how the knowledge that A->P1 and B->P2 are associated with each other in an important way is represented.

    Put another way, I can't see how you could take the SAM record A->P1 and "find" the corresponding sibling B->P2 while recognizing that B->P4 is not the correct sibling.

    If this information is in fact lost, does this mean that SAM is not expressive enough to capture ambiguous alignments for paired end reads? And won't it mean that downstream processors, e.g. CuffLinks, will not have access to important information that was originally available?

    Apologies for the long-winded question!

    thanks for your time,

  • #2
    I believe the position of the mate is contained in field 8 and the distance between mates is contained in the field 9 in the SAM format so the SAM format should be able to contain enough information to correctly match P1 with P2 and P3 with P4. Briefly looking at my own SAM files produced by TopHat, it seems TopHat does not use field 9, but the mate position is reported in field 8 (if the mate is mapped).

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks Thomas.

      Perhaps there is still a certain amount of ambiguity in the some cases, e.g.?

      A->P1
      B->P2

      A->P3
      B->P2 (B is the same in both)

      In this scenario, presumably TopHat would output two B->P2 SAM records, each with a different field 8?

      If this is the case, field 8 of the A->P1 SAM record is now ambiguous (since it refers equally well to both B->P2s)?

      I wonder how CuffLinks etc. processes these kinds of scenarios - perhaps it doesn't need to deconvolute pairs?

      Thanks

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        The Impact of AI in Genomic Medicine
        by seqadmin



        Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic vision to a mainstream technology, highlighted by the introduction of tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini. In recent years, AI has become increasingly integrated into the field of genomics. This integration has enabled new scientific discoveries while simultaneously raising important ethical questions1. Interviews with two researchers at the center of this intersection provide insightful perspectives into...
        02-26-2024, 02:07 PM
      • seqadmin
        Multiomics Techniques Advancing Disease Research
        by seqadmin


        New and advanced multiomics tools and technologies have opened new avenues of research and markedly enhanced various disciplines such as disease research and precision medicine1. The practice of merging diverse data from various ‘omes increasingly provides a more holistic understanding of biological systems. As Maddison Masaeli, Co-Founder and CEO at Deepcell, aptly noted, “You can't explain biology in its complex form with one modality.”

        A major leap in the field has
        ...
        02-08-2024, 06:33 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 02-28-2024, 06:12 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 02-23-2024, 04:11 PM
      0 responses
      74 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2024, 08:52 AM
      0 responses
      82 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 02-20-2024, 08:57 AM
      0 responses
      69 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X