Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • evenstar
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 1

    DESeq2 design error

    Hi,

    I am trying to run DESeq2 using the "Differential analysis of count data ~ the DESeq2 package provided in the bioconductor website. I want to do an Multi-factor design. I created my count files using HTseq and created a combined table from all the count files.

    However I am running in the following error after this step:

    Code:
    > dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = countDATA,
                                 colData = coldata,
                                 design = ~ condition + treatment )
    Error in DESeqDataSet(se, design = design, ignoreRank) : 
      the model matrix is not full rank, so the model cannot be fit as specified.
      one or more variables or interaction terms in the design formula
      are linear combinations of the others and must be removed
    If I try to run the function using only design = ~ condition everything works just fine.

    my coldata table:
    Code:
    row.names	condition	type	treatment	autoAntibodies
    HS06	        0	0	0	0
    HS07        	0	0	0	0
    HS10        	0	0	0	0
    HS15	        0	0	0	0
    HS16	        0	0	0	0
    HS17	        0	0	0	0
    RITIS01	1	2	1	1
    RITIS02	1	2	2	1
    RITIS07	1	2	1	1
    RITIS09	1	1	1	2
    RITIS10	1	2	2	1
    RITIS12	1	1	1	2
    RITIS14	1	2	1	1
    RITIS16	1	1	1	1
    I would like to create a full design which takes all the factors into account (condition, type, treatment and autoAntibodies). Could you please explain why the above design does not work.

    Thanks,
    Even
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    If "type", "treatment", and "autoAntibodies" are factors, then "condition" is dictated by them.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...