Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jussalmi
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 3

    #1

    Batch effect in Methylkit and SVA

    Hello!

    I have 6 RRBS samples that I am analyzing in MethylKit. After looking at the clustering and PCA plots it seems that there are batch effects. The 6 samples were done at 3 different times, each time one control and one case. The samples cluster according to these batches.

    How can I remove the batch effects with SVA or other tools? I looked at the assocComp function and there were 3 PCA components that seemed to be correlated with batches at the 0.1 - 0.2 level. I don't trust that removing those 3 components removes just the batch effects.

    SVA is recommended in the documentation, but I'm not an expert in R and I'm not sure how to use with MethylKit.
  • jnhutchinson
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 6

    #2
    Did you ever figure this out? I'm in the same boat with batch effects.

    I've seen other posts claiming people use SVA on logit transformed values, but I'm not sure how I would - or if I should - incorporate the SVA transformed data back into the methylKit workflow.

    Comment

    • jussalmi
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Radmeth

      No I didn't. I moved my analysis to RADmeth/Methpipe. In RADmeth you can define covariates in the design matrix to take care of batch effects.

      Comment

      • jnhutchinson
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 6

        #4
        Thanks! That's really helpful. I'll check it out.

        Comment

        • jussalmi
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2015
          • 3

          #5
          Example

          Here's a clarifying text I got from the author of RADmeth (I had 15 samples in three batches):

          "First of all, you are absolutely correct. To account for batch effects you can add a few more columns to the design matrix. I have attached an example of such a matrix. It describes a dataset containing 15 samples. The samples are grouped into 3 batches. This is encoded by columns base, batch1, and batch2. (Note that you only need two extra columns to specify three groups: batch1 and batch2 permit methylation levels of two groups of samples to deviate from the third, base group; this gives you three total groups that correspond to batches; see what I mean?). The last column, testfact, defines a factor level that you would use for testing.


          base batch1 batch2 testfact
          sample01 1 0 0 0
          sample02 1 0 0 0
          sample03 1 0 0 0
          sample04 1 0 0 1
          sample05 1 0 0 1
          sample06 1 1 0 0
          sample07 1 1 0 0
          sample08 1 1 0 0
          sample09 1 1 0 1
          sample10 1 1 0 1
          sample11 1 0 1 0
          sample12 1 0 1 0
          sample13 1 0 1 0
          sample14 1 0 1 1
          sample15 1 0 1 1
          "

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...