Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lugalbanda
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 3

    Limma multifactor experiment design matrix

    Hi, so I am very confused as to how I can make a multifactor design for limma RNA differential expression. I've read other posts in different forums and none of the answers are very explicit (to me) as to how to build a multifactor design

    For examples, say I have p1N, p1T, p2N, and p2T, where p# is patient number and N/T is normal tumor.

    I can build a single factor design matrix like this:

    ------Normal------Tumor
    1 ------ 1 --------- 0
    2 ------ 0 --------- 1
    3 ------ 1 --------- 0
    4 ------ 0 --------- 1

    I am completely lost as to how I can build a numeric matrix with multiple factors, which in this case, the factors would be patient number and N/T.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Code:
    d = data.frame(patient=factor(c("p1", "p1", "p2", "p2", ...)),
                   condition=factor(c("N", "T", "N", "T", ...)))
    design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)
    N.B., I've likely made a typo somewhere, but that's the gist.

    Comment

    • Lugalbanda
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Oh, I thought I had to manually build a numeric matrix for the design matrix. Thanks. I have a followup question. I understand that the intercept column that is resulted is used for pair wise comparison. My question is when to use:

      design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)
      as opposed to this
      design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)

      Ok I found this from another post:

      EDIT:
      "This [design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)] (a cell means model) simply computes the mean expression for each group, and then you have to make all contrasts explicitly. The [design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)] has an implicit contrast (everything is a comparison to control), so you have to make contrasts for some comparisons, but not for others."

      from https://support.bioconductor.org/p/57268/


      So is it safe to say this only matters if I am doing a contrast matrix comparison?
      Last edited by Lugalbanda; 10-18-2016, 09:35 AM.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Correct, the "0+" is only needed if you want to specify contrasts, which aren't needed to answer your question.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...