Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lugalbanda
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 3

    Limma multifactor experiment design matrix

    Hi, so I am very confused as to how I can make a multifactor design for limma RNA differential expression. I've read other posts in different forums and none of the answers are very explicit (to me) as to how to build a multifactor design

    For examples, say I have p1N, p1T, p2N, and p2T, where p# is patient number and N/T is normal tumor.

    I can build a single factor design matrix like this:

    ------Normal------Tumor
    1 ------ 1 --------- 0
    2 ------ 0 --------- 1
    3 ------ 1 --------- 0
    4 ------ 0 --------- 1

    I am completely lost as to how I can build a numeric matrix with multiple factors, which in this case, the factors would be patient number and N/T.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Code:
    d = data.frame(patient=factor(c("p1", "p1", "p2", "p2", ...)),
                   condition=factor(c("N", "T", "N", "T", ...)))
    design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)
    N.B., I've likely made a typo somewhere, but that's the gist.

    Comment

    • Lugalbanda
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Oh, I thought I had to manually build a numeric matrix for the design matrix. Thanks. I have a followup question. I understand that the intercept column that is resulted is used for pair wise comparison. My question is when to use:

      design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)
      as opposed to this
      design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)

      Ok I found this from another post:

      EDIT:
      "This [design = model.matrix(~0+patient + condition, d)] (a cell means model) simply computes the mean expression for each group, and then you have to make all contrasts explicitly. The [design = model.matrix(~patient + condition, d)] has an implicit contrast (everything is a comparison to control), so you have to make contrasts for some comparisons, but not for others."

      from https://support.bioconductor.org/p/57268/


      So is it safe to say this only matters if I am doing a contrast matrix comparison?
      Last edited by Lugalbanda; 10-18-2016, 09:35 AM.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Correct, the "0+" is only needed if you want to specify contrasts, which aren't needed to answer your question.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...