Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • evobio
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 3

    Agilent TapeStation vs. Qubit: RNA concentration.

    SCENARIO:

    After RNA extraction (RNA-seq is my aim), I check the concentration of the extracted RNA with Qubit, and then run the extracted RNA on Agilent TapeStation 2200 with HSRNA ScreenTape. The concentrations are listed below and the RINe values from the TapeStation are shown in the picture.

    Qubit concentrations vs. TapeStation concentrations:
    A1 = 14.9 ng/uL vs. 40.6 ng/uL
    B1 = 19.4 ng/uL vs. 60.2 ng/uL
    C1 = 24.4 ng/uL vs. 135 ng/uL
    D1 = 21.5 ng/uL vs. 110 ng/uL
    E1 = 32.3 ng/uL vs. ?

    QUESTIONS:

    1. Which concentration values should I trust: Qubit or TapeStation?

    2. Should I trust the RINe values of the TapeStation, even though the error message says "RNA concentration outside the recommended range for RINe", or should I dilute the sample according to the concentration given by the TapeStation and run them again?

    3. I've been told to use samples with approximately the same concentration on the TapeStation because the bad concentration of one sample (either too high or too low) can affect the results of the other samples. Is that true? How can one sample affect the result of another?
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    SCENARIO:

    After RNA extraction (RNA-seq is my aim), I check the concentration of the extracted RNA with Qubit, and then run the extracted RNA on Agilent TapeStation 2200 with HSRNA ScreenTape. The concentrations are listed below and the RINe values from the TapeStation are shown in the picture.

    Qubit concentrations vs. TapeStation concentrations:
    A1 = 14.9 ng/uL vs. 40.6 ng/uL
    B1 = 19.4 ng/uL vs. 60.2 ng/uL
    C1 = 24.4 ng/uL vs. 135 ng/uL
    D1 = 21.5 ng/uL vs. 110 ng/uL
    E1 = 32.3 ng/uL vs. ?

    QUESTIONS:

    1. Which concentration values should I trust: Qubit or TapeStation?
    Probably Qubit. But which dye were you using? As long as you were using the RNA-specific dye, then trust the Qubit.
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    2. Should I trust the RINe values of the TapeStation, even though the error message says "RNA concentration outside the recommended range for RINe", or should I dilute the sample according to the concentration given by the TapeStation and run them again?
    I don't know. Do you want to for some reason? What will you do with the RIN score?
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    3. I've been told to use samples with approximately the same concentration on the TapeStation because the bad concentration of one sample (either too high or too low) can affect the results of the other samples. Is that true? How can one sample affect the result of another?
    Seems crazy to me, but there are crazy aspects to the Agilent Bioanalyzer. So maybe there are also goofy issues with the TapeStation as well.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • evobio
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2015
      • 3

      #3
      1. I am using the appropriate Qubit dye (Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit).

      2. The extracted RNA will be used in the preparation of RNA-seq libraries, so I'm using the RINe scores from the TapeStation as a proxy of the quality of the RNA. So I guess I need to run the samples again with the new concentrations in order to trust completely the RINe scores of the TapeStation.

      3. To me that doesn't make sense, because that means one bad sample can give you bad scores for all other samples (even if they are good). If that really is the case, each run should have only one sample, which is absurd.
      Last edited by evobio; 08-03-2015, 03:25 AM.

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        2. Okay.
        3. Actually, Agilent has decent tech support. Maybe give them a call about this issue. See if it is true...

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...