Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • evobio
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 3

    #1

    Agilent TapeStation vs. Qubit: RNA concentration.

    SCENARIO:

    After RNA extraction (RNA-seq is my aim), I check the concentration of the extracted RNA with Qubit, and then run the extracted RNA on Agilent TapeStation 2200 with HSRNA ScreenTape. The concentrations are listed below and the RINe values from the TapeStation are shown in the picture.

    Qubit concentrations vs. TapeStation concentrations:
    A1 = 14.9 ng/uL vs. 40.6 ng/uL
    B1 = 19.4 ng/uL vs. 60.2 ng/uL
    C1 = 24.4 ng/uL vs. 135 ng/uL
    D1 = 21.5 ng/uL vs. 110 ng/uL
    E1 = 32.3 ng/uL vs. ?

    QUESTIONS:

    1. Which concentration values should I trust: Qubit or TapeStation?

    2. Should I trust the RINe values of the TapeStation, even though the error message says "RNA concentration outside the recommended range for RINe", or should I dilute the sample according to the concentration given by the TapeStation and run them again?

    3. I've been told to use samples with approximately the same concentration on the TapeStation because the bad concentration of one sample (either too high or too low) can affect the results of the other samples. Is that true? How can one sample affect the result of another?
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    SCENARIO:

    After RNA extraction (RNA-seq is my aim), I check the concentration of the extracted RNA with Qubit, and then run the extracted RNA on Agilent TapeStation 2200 with HSRNA ScreenTape. The concentrations are listed below and the RINe values from the TapeStation are shown in the picture.

    Qubit concentrations vs. TapeStation concentrations:
    A1 = 14.9 ng/uL vs. 40.6 ng/uL
    B1 = 19.4 ng/uL vs. 60.2 ng/uL
    C1 = 24.4 ng/uL vs. 135 ng/uL
    D1 = 21.5 ng/uL vs. 110 ng/uL
    E1 = 32.3 ng/uL vs. ?

    QUESTIONS:

    1. Which concentration values should I trust: Qubit or TapeStation?
    Probably Qubit. But which dye were you using? As long as you were using the RNA-specific dye, then trust the Qubit.
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    2. Should I trust the RINe values of the TapeStation, even though the error message says "RNA concentration outside the recommended range for RINe", or should I dilute the sample according to the concentration given by the TapeStation and run them again?
    I don't know. Do you want to for some reason? What will you do with the RIN score?
    Originally posted by evobio View Post
    3. I've been told to use samples with approximately the same concentration on the TapeStation because the bad concentration of one sample (either too high or too low) can affect the results of the other samples. Is that true? How can one sample affect the result of another?
    Seems crazy to me, but there are crazy aspects to the Agilent Bioanalyzer. So maybe there are also goofy issues with the TapeStation as well.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • evobio
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2015
      • 3

      #3
      1. I am using the appropriate Qubit dye (Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit).

      2. The extracted RNA will be used in the preparation of RNA-seq libraries, so I'm using the RINe scores from the TapeStation as a proxy of the quality of the RNA. So I guess I need to run the samples again with the new concentrations in order to trust completely the RINe scores of the TapeStation.

      3. To me that doesn't make sense, because that means one bad sample can give you bad scores for all other samples (even if they are good). If that really is the case, each run should have only one sample, which is absurd.
      Last edited by evobio; 08-03-2015, 03:25 AM.

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        2. Okay.
        3. Actually, Agilent has decent tech support. Maybe give them a call about this issue. See if it is true...

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          Yesterday, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        78 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...