Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swapna
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 2

    #1

    De novo trouble

    Hello,

    I have 1.3 million paired-end 454 reads for a bacterial genome with an expected size of 4.5 MB.

    When I tried de novo assembly using the default Newbler parameters it estimated a genome size of 197 MB!! I got over 2000 contigs with an N50 of 2216 bases

    Is there an input parameter for expected genome size? Or are there any other parameters that I should modify to get a better output?

    Thanks,
    Swapna
  • maven
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 11

    #2
    Take it to your support rep. Newbler's genome size estimate are calculated directly from the coverage depth histogram immediately preceding it in the 454NewblerMetrics.txt file. So if that histogram is skewed for some reason the size estimate will be off. 2000 contigs for a 4.5 Mb genome is very bad, therefore you probably have something about your experiment that is causing it to contig poorly. The first thing that springs to mind is that your 1.3 million reads seems like way more than you really need. If they are 400 bp each and they all derive from your genome of interest, that's something like 115x. Newbler likes 20-35x the best, so try assembling less data. Second, if you have contaminants from other genomes then you could really be looking at a combination of contigs from your genome of interest, plus a whole lot of garbage from the contamination. The total contig length might give you a clue about this, as would the size distribution and coverage distribution of contigs (check 454ContigGraph.txt). Finally if the genome is highly repetitive or extremely biased in AT content (like P.falciparum, which is somethiing like 80% AT) then it might be really hard to get good contigging no matter what you do. Do any of these scenarios seem likely to you?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2




      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
      Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    71 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...