Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CCBIO
    • Jul 2026

    primer dimer

    Hi everyone,
    We have to do a 454 GS junior run but amplimers coming up from our two steps PCR have a visible primer dimer. Do you think this will influence the quality of the run (more short reads, etc) or the AMpure purification is sufficient to get rid of all dimers?
    Thank you.
  • jdelton
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 11

    #2
    You may need to do multiple ampure clean-ups to get rid of the dimers. (we occasionally do 2 ampure and a gel slice purification).

    Comment

    • Benh
      Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 11

      #3
      Hi jdelton,

      Do you mind sharing what's your typical recovery from ampure and gel purification?

      When we follow Roche's clean up protocol our recovery is super below like under 10% (even <1%). It becomes not practical to perform clean up when you almost end up with nothing.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • jdelton
        Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 11

        #4
        We actually modified Roche's clean up for our ampure. We do 70% of the volume (more or less depending on the ampure calibration which we do with out sizing solution) of the pool - Pool=100ul ampure = 70ul. This clean up is eluted in 100ul and started again. Our final elution is in 30ul. Overall I couldn't tell you what our percent recovery is, but it's enough that it is clearly able to be visualized on an agarose gel and using a bioanalyzer. And more than enough to dilute into emPCR.

        Comment

        • UofG
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2012
          • 5

          #5
          Originally posted by jdelton View Post
          We actually modified Roche's clean up for our ampure. We do 70% of the volume (more or less depending on the ampure calibration which we do with out sizing solution) of the pool - Pool=100ul ampure = 70ul. This clean up is eluted in 100ul and started again. Our final elution is in 30ul. Overall I couldn't tell you what our percent recovery is, but it's enough that it is clearly able to be visualized on an agarose gel and using a bioanalyzer. And more than enough to dilute into emPCR.
          Do you omit the Sizing Sizing solution completely when performing the AMpure clean up? I have had mixed results using the Sizing Solution, and often wondered if I'd be better off without it.

          Comment

          • jdelton
            Member
            • Nov 2011
            • 11

            #6
            Yes we omitted it completely. It was a pain, expensive, and the whole purpose was to have consistent results, yet you still have to calibrate it every time. Plus it didn't flow into our workflow easily.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Yesterday, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            29 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...