Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Estimating genome size and coverage

    Hi everyone,

    I'm new to sequencing and am wondering if I have estimated my genome size and therefore expected coverage for 454 sequencing correctly.

    From flow cytometry I know that my plant is 25pg/2c=12.5pg/c
    if 1pg=978Mb
    then 978*12.5=12225Mb.
    This is what I believe my genome size to be.

    Therefore if I did 1/8th of a plate with an estimated throughput of 30-55Mb, my expected coverage is then:
    30/12225-55/12225 = 0.00245x-0.0045X coverage.

    This seems very small and I am wondering if I did this all wrong??
    Thanks in advance for your help!

  • #2
    Your math seems to be correct. Basically you have a very large genome of 12 Gbases (not too atypical for a plant but certainly much larger than arabidopsis or rice) being sequenced on 1/8th of the smallest 2nd gen sequencer. Your coverage is going to be small.

    The 454 is useful for transcriptome, RNA-seq and coverage of small genomes (think bacterial size) but will be expensive trying to sequence a large genome on it. You should use the SOLiD or one of the Illumina machines and an entire plate for large-genome whole genome sequencing projects. A SOLiD-4 full plate mate-pair project (two runs) would produce somewhere around 40-50 Gbases. Short reads, of course, but you are getting closer to the 'X' coverage you would need for whole-genome sequencing.

    A concern in your calculations is the effect of ploidy -- are you sure that you are 12.5pg per 2-C? Or is the C-level higher?

    Even if the C-level is higher (say a hexaploid like wheat) then your calculations are only increase the coverage level by 2 or 3 or 4 or some other low number. 1/8th of a 454 plate just does not go very far.

    Of course talk to me 5 years in the past and tell me that 50Mbases is "nothing". Oh my ... how times change. :-)

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks!
      I appreciate the advice, I'll look into this.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      47 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X