Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elsie
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 85

    #1

    De novo assembly - plant genome - read length + amount

    Hi,
    I am looking to do my first de novo assembly:
    Plant, diploid, genome size of just under 1gig, no reference, 2 samples, happy to start with only a draft Illumina assembly, genome NOT transcriptome.
    I would guess PE, but 50bp or 100bp or 300bp?, 30x coverage? Sufficient data off a MiSeq?
    Any feedback appreciated, thank you.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    The longer the reads, the better. The amount of coverage you need likely depends on the ploidy and heterozygosity; a tetraploid organism may need over 4x the coverage of a haploid. But even for a haploid I would suggest aiming for at least 50x, and for an organism that's highly heterozygous, 50x per ploidy. Bear in mind that Illumina coverage is not very even, so there will be many places where the actual coverage is substantially below the average.

    We make most of our fungal assemblies with around 100x fragment library coverage, with 2x150bp HiSeq reads. I don't work much with plants directly, but I understand that our plant group tries to get 2x250bp MiSeq data because plants are typically bigger and more polyploid than fungi. For an optimal assembly you should use both fragment and long-mate-pair libraries, but that's more difficult (lab-wise) and much more expensive, and may not be needed for a decent assembly; it depends on the genome.

    So you MIGHT be able to get all the coverage you need from a single HighSeq lane, but you'll definitely need multiple MiSeq lanes; however, MiSeq will give longer reads and thus a better assembly at a higher cost per base pair.

    Comment

    • Elsie
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 85

      #3
      Thank you Brian, that is extremely useful, I really appreciate this.

      Comment

      • usad
        Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 53

        #4
        Hi

        it might also be advisable to check (consider) the homozygosity. (If you have some coverage you see this in kmer plots). But you can also estimazte this if this is an inbred line and whether or not it is self compatible.
        If in doubt go for longer reads. There is of course a trade off between quality and length but 50bp is definitely too short.
        In any case unfortunately no two plant genomes are exactly the same. As one major bugbear are repetetive/transposable elements of differrent sizes.

        We usually do one/two Miseq runs 2x300 to get a feeling for the genome.

        Best Wishes
        Björn

        Comment

        • Elsie
          Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 85

          #5
          Thanks Bjorn, helpful comments. I doubt we'll do any pre-sequencing, we will just commit to one type and then go for it, but your comments on 300bp match what I have read in other publications.

          Comment

          • usad
            Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 53

            #6
            Hi Elsie

            if you have your own Miseq, you can also get slightly longer runs. (We picked his up from here) but this is totally unsupoorted though.

            björn

            Comment

            • Elsie
              Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 85

              #7
              Hi Bjorn, thank for you for that. I spoke with the core where we are going to do our sequencing and have decided to go for a HiSeq run 150bp paired ends (1 lane) as the quality on the current MiSeq 300bp PE drops off significantly, so I would lose a lot after trimming.
              Thank you.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              68 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...