Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PatrickV
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 2

    #1

    PacBio Amplicon reads assembly

    I've got a question regarding the assembly of PacBio reads. We've created a library of approximately 5000 different amplicons between 1 and 3kb and successfully ran these on a couple of flow cells. Next we've ran the RS_ReadsOfInsert protocol and demultiplexed the data with the corresponding barcodes.
    The next step is to align/assemble these reads to each other to build contigs of multiple reads mapping to the same consensus. However the majority of the tools (HGAP, Quiver) that I come across are designed to do (de novo) genome assembly, that is not what we are aiming at, we "just" want to align/assemble the PacBio demultiplexed reads and build contigs from 1-3 kb.
    What tool would be the best to perform this job?
  • rhall
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 324

    #2
    I'm not sure I understand, are the 1-3kb amplicons tiled, and you are trying to assemble a longer sequence? Otherwise, using the quality filter in the reads_of_insert protocol you can generate 99.9 accurate amplicons, or are you trying to cluster the amplicon sequences?

    Comment

    • PatrickV
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2015
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by rhall View Post
      I'm not sure I understand, are the 1-3kb amplicons tiled, and you are trying to assemble a longer sequence? Otherwise, using the quality filter in the reads_of_insert protocol you can generate 99.9 accurate amplicons, or are you trying to cluster the amplicon sequences?
      No the amplicons are not tiled. After the generation of the reads I indeed would like to cluster the same amplicon sequences together.

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        I wrote a tool for clustering PacBio reads of insert. It does not generate a consensus, but it will output the single highest-quality read per cluster... or, you can generate a consensus from the clusters, if you have a good consensus-generation tool. For my application, the single best read was much better than the consensus, which tended to be chimeric.

        Syntax:

        dedupe.sh in=ros.fq csf=stats.txt outbest=best.fq qin=33 am=f ac=f fo c rnc=f mcs=2 k=27 mo=1400 cc pto nam=4 e=26 pattern=cluster_%.fq

        I've found those specific settings to be extremely good for 16s sequences which are ~1500bp long. But if you have variable size amplicons, you may need to first bin them by size and use a different "mo" (min overlap) and "e" (max edit distance) setting for the individual bins.

        Dedupe is part of the BBTools package.

        Comment

        • rhall
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 324

          #5
          To generate a consensus, I would use something like Brian's clustering tool above (usearch, and CDHit are other options) then generate a reference from the best cluster representatives and use it in a quiver resequencing job. This approach works best if the diversity is limited, and clusters represent the same sequence and not closely related sequences, in which case, as is pointed out above, a representative single molecule consensus (at ~QV30) may be more useful than a heterogeneous multi-molecule quiver consensus.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2




            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
            Yesterday, 06:46 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          71 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...