Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JPC
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 116

    Re-use empty lanes

    I found out today that AB have a protocol for re-using empty flowcell lanes. I was told they aren't distributing it but will hand it out if requested.

    I don't have it yet but I understand that there is an addition to the ICS which you can run which will dry out the cell then you tape the wholes and store it at 4 degrees where it can be kept for two weeks for re-use of empty lanes. There is an expected 10% reduction in performance over new cells.

    Has anyone tried this yet? I will try it out in a few weeks when the instrument becomes available and I'll post the results here

    JPC
  • RPiddock
    Lab Monkey
    • Jun 2011
    • 16

    #2
    Hi JPC,

    That definately sounds useful, do you have the protocol for that?

    Thanks

    Comment

    • JPC
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 116

      #3
      Yes I have the pdf but I was asked not to circulate it as they want people to go through their own reps.

      Comment

      • paolo.kunder
        Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 93

        #4
        Did Lifetech provided You the protocol or someone else?

        Comment

        • pmiguel
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 2328

          #5
          Our ABI sales rep mentioned there was a protocol for this. So I presume it is available from Lifetech/ABI -- if you have a Field Application Specialist, I would ask them.

          --
          Phillip

          Comment

          • JPC
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 116

            #6
            Yes it was from our FAS, we haven't tried it yet but I'll post a reply when we do.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...