Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lilletine
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    Guidelines - DNA input

    Hello - I am very new to this, our lab has just set up til 5500xl and we are about to start the first run. I am looking all over for general guidelines regarding library DNA input for the ePCR but i am unable to find documentation for this other than the 'ePCR calculator' which suggests 500 pM input DNA. We learn that it is really important to get the correct ratio of DNA and beads so i would like to see recommendations in writing. I am very grateful for any help regarding this!
  • JPC
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 116

    #2
    Hi, the ePCR calculator is the only way to calculate your input DNA. For an E120 reaction we use a Titration point of 0.616 picomoles (which you get my adjusting the "Desired P2% post enrich" to 18) the enter your library size and concentration (ideally around 70-80 pg/ul). Ultimately for an E120 we end up loading around 5,000 - 6,000 pg of DNA depending on your product size.

    In terms of general advice, we normally use with 2ug of DNA to make a library, we found using the max (5ug) often caused problems, as did other users we know. Also after you have ligated your adaptors you come to an 'optional' amplification step.... we have found that this is NOT optional. No matter how much library you have at this stage I recommend doing the number of cycles listed in the table (page 26 of the Frag Lib prep User Guide).

    Good luck with your run

    JC
    Last edited by JPC; 02-08-2012, 04:18 AM.

    Comment

    • JPC
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 116

      #3
      also, I'm not sure if it says this in the manuals but we tend to try and load 400M beads per lane

      JC

      Comment

      • lilletine
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 7

        #4
        Thank you very much for your help!

        Comment

        • yhey
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 3

          #5
          James, I am interested to know why you think the optional amplification is not optional. What problems have you encountered by not amplifying?

          Thanks
          Yvonne

          Comment

          • JPC
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 116

            #6
            Hi Yvonne, skipping this step was the cause of the problems we experienced at the start (with the Enricher not returning the beads we were expecting). AB suggested that at the end of library prep there is still a significant proportion of fragments with no adaptor or just 1 adaptor so the 'optional amp' enriches for the fragments with 2 adaptors (P1-P2, P1-P1 and P2-P2).

            Comment

            • yhey
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2010
              • 3

              #7
              Originally posted by JPC View Post
              Hi Yvonne, skipping this step was the cause of the problems we experienced at the start (with the Enricher not returning the beads we were expecting). AB suggested that at the end of library prep there is still a significant proportion of fragments with no adaptor or just 1 adaptor so the 'optional amp' enriches for the fragments with 2 adaptors (P1-P2, P1-P1 and P2-P2).
              OK I thought that might be your reply. I have just had a similar experience with my first unamplified fragment libraries in that an E80 enrichment gave a bead yield less than expected from E20 but the sequence quality looks fine. I'll definitely amplify next time though!

              Thanks for the post James.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...