Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JPC
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 116

    #1

    Library Builder

    Is anyone using the LT Library builder for the 5500 or Ion systems? I can't find any posts....which might mean no one is having any problems with them OR no one has them!

    which is it, does anybody love their Library Builder?

    JPC
  • lilletine
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    #2
    We have a LibraryBuilder installed in Bergen. We have only used it a handful of times but we have been happy with the results so far, both DNA and RNA. We will start using it more often now, as we have got a modified protocol to use it with SureSelect. All the best, christine

    Comment

    • MrGuy
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 68

      #3
      We have one and it works as advertised. It obviates the need of a lot of other equipment when short on budget -- bioanalyzer, shearing tool, size selection. It takes about 2.5 hrs to run. Some nice things about it are you can choose to automate shearing and/or size selection on instrument or opt to do it off instrument. Kits are a bit pricey compared to manual kits, but cheaper than other cartridge kits. You can also do DNA/RNA extraction if you put in a different protocol card.

      Comment

      • JPC
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 116

        #4
        Thanks for replying both.

        Christine, is the sure select protocol from Agilent?

        MrGuy, how are you shearing on the Lib Builder?

        JC

        Comment

        • lilletine
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 7

          #5
          JPC, no the protocol is not validated by Agilent nor Life, but has been run successfully by another lab. Basically, we will generate fragment libraries according to Life, with their primers and barcodes, and then jump into SureSelect at hybridisation. We will use blockers from the Life TargetSeq kit. Will try it out next week.

          Comment

          • MrGuy
            Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 68

            #6
            We're just using Ion Shear. We haven't seen any notable artifacts so far, but we only use it occasionally. I think we are up to 40 genomes on it, many of which were replicats or nearly identical (and genomes really aren't what we focus on). Sure beats buying a covaris or similar.

            Comment

            • JPC
              Senior Member
              • May 2008
              • 116

              #7
              Originally posted by MrGuy View Post
              We're just using Ion Shear. We haven't seen any notable artifacts so far, but we only use it occasionally. I think we are up to 40 genomes on it, many of which were replicats or nearly identical (and genomes really aren't what we focus on). Sure beats buying a covaris or similar.
              ah I see, we're still waiting for installation of our Ion, I had assumed it would still require the Covaris, it would be nice if someone at LifeTech had mentioned a new shearing technique to me!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...