Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bioits
    replied
    Originally posted by RCJK View Post
    Sorry Phillip (go Boilers!), but I'm not joking or mistaken. During the talk of the Life Tech. sequencing platforms, there was a slide showing both instruments w/ the new names, and he said that we were one of the first groups of people to hear that new info. The speaker was Michael Rhodes, Senior Manager - Sequencing, from Life Technologies.
    I heard the same. In addition, from the slide they showed, HQ will have a new look, more like PI not S4.

    Leave a comment:


  • RCJK
    replied
    Sorry Phillip (go Boilers!), but I'm not joking or mistaken. During the talk of the Life Tech. sequencing platforms, there was a slide showing both instruments w/ the new names, and he said that we were one of the first groups of people to hear that new info. The speaker was Michael Rhodes, Senior Manager - Sequencing, from Life Technologies.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    Originally posted by Chipper View Post
    Makes sense to change the name if it is a completely new instrument... Not sure what the 5500 would stand for though, something with a new encoding scheme or the error rate?
    I'm sure he is joking or mistaken.

    ABI, for whatever reason, used to go with serial number-like product names. The earliest slab gel sequencers were all 37x, where "x" was 0, 3 or 7. Then the 48/96 capillary sequencers that followed were 37x0 where "x" was a 0 or 3.

    So the sequencer that followed the 3730XL should have been the 37000. But ABI, by this point, presumably realized that names were easier for most people to remember than numbers. I don't see them going back to the old naming methods.

    Sad, in a way. Knowledge of an ABI sequencer name once meant something. It was a shibboleth. If someone started talking about running a 377 you knew they did probably did not come by this knowledge lightly. More than likely they suffered, just like you did, pouring those slab gels without bubbles. And if you related your problems with "red rain", they might well weep in empathy with you.

    On the other hand, no instrument I've ever used has a "misery index" even approaching that of the SOLiD. (I'll define this index as the cost of a lost run multiplied by the length, in days, of a run.)

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • SrScientist
    replied
    5500? wasn´t that the "name" of ABIs QTRAP? confusing. However, I don´t care about names if the product fits.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chipper
    replied
    Makes sense to change the name if it is a completely new instrument... Not sure what the 5500 would stand for though, something with a new encoding scheme or the error rate?

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    I presume you are joking.

    In any case the SOLiD v1 should be the 37000.

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • RCJK
    replied
    At a Life Tech. talk last week they showed some slides and it seems they've renamed the Pi and the HQ to something like the 5500 and 5500XL. I don't recall a mention of release dates though.

    Leave a comment:


  • SrScientist
    replied
    hi all, I got the info that these two new solids will be launched at the ASHG.

    Leave a comment:


  • bioits
    replied
    From the link below, it sounds like PI will be available in Dec and HQ in March next year.
    http://www.benzinga.com/analyst-rati...r-meeting-with

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    Last I heard, 4hq was slated for release at the end of the year. I have also heard that unlike all previous upgrades, this 4hq will be expensive. On the order of $100,000 (USD). So that probably means a new camera to support smaller bead sizes? Possibly other changes to allow longer reads (75 bases)?

    Here is a link to a story back in the spring:

    v4

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • avilella
    started a topic Solid 4HQ?

    Solid 4HQ?

    Does anybody know if the solid 4hq is anywhere close to being released or if anybody has any idea of the day-to-day throughput of the machine?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...