Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    Method for targeted sequencing

    Hi,

    My goal is to obtain the sequence of a gene from several species. I know the sequence only in 2 species separated by ~30mya. Designing optimal primers is not an option, since if the PCR reaction doesn't work in one species, I wouldn't know whether its because the primers failed or the gene is absent. Southern is too cumbersome, in my opinion. Wonder if there is another way to do my job? I checked for commercial kits but most kits for targeted sequencing are in humans and I'm working in a non-model plant lineage.

    I want to stress that I only want to get only selected loci (5 genes in my case)...
  • riv
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 3

    #2
    Hi! I am not sure if I got your question right, but I have these ideas:

    These genes that you are interested on maybe have some region that is more conserved and therefore it can be amplified with PCR. Even if you get a tiny part, you can do RACE PCR after that.

    If you only have the sequences in 2 species and you want to check which parts should be more conserved, you can look for those genes in another taxa and make some multiple alignment.

    Anyway, I know that optimizing PCR can be really annoying. If somebody has another idea, I´m interested too.

    Comment

    • SNPsaurus
      Registered Vendor
      • May 2013
      • 525

      #3
      For isolating DNA that has high divergence, pulldown by hybridization is usually better. You can order pulldown baits from any oligo supplier, such as IDT https://www.idtdna.com/pages/product...target-capture, or MYcroarray for larger regions.
      Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...