Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SS00
    PhD Student
    • Jun 2012
    • 33

    #1

    No DNA in ChIP IgG Control - Strange?

    Hi Guys,

    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Background:
    It's my first time doing ChIP. I am testing a native ChIP protocol with MNase digestion using Protein A/G beads and H3K4Me3 and H3K27Me3. Because my samples are mononucleosomes (140bp) I didn't do qPCR prior to library preparation because of the difficulty of designing primers for such small fragments. I used 30,000 Cells (10,000 per IP).

    Problem:
    Although there is product in my H3K4Me3 and H3K27Me3 IP's, I have no product in my IgG sample (as detectable by HS Bioanalyzer). In my naive knowledge of ChIp I am tempted to say this is a great result as my IgG is a negative control and should hypothetically have pulled down no sample but someone else in my lab who has done X-linked ChIP using Diagenode's kit has a fair deal of product in her H3K's AND IgG's.

    Any ideas as to the difference? I used Rabbit IgG instead of mouse (my cells are murine) - would that make a difference?

    I've attached my Bioanalyzer traces.
    Side note: My Input control is quite low - the main kit I am modifying for this N-ChIP suggests using 10ul from a 100ul dilution of chromatin for Input control. Instead, I pooled 4ul of each Input dilution prior to immunoprecipitation to result in 12ul of Input control for library prep. Do you think this is a good method for Input control? I am quite worried that the concentration is lower than my IPs - although it makes sense why it is (due to the lower input) I am not sure this is a good experimental design or if it is normal for all ChIPs? Would a better design be splitting my chromatin in 4 - 3 x 100ul for IPs and 1x 100ul for Input control? That way the input is the same - or does that not matter since I only pull down a percentage of DNA in each 100ul IP vs ''100%'' of on input control?

    Sorry for the rambling questions!
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...