Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dr_grm
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 5

    Scriptseq complete gold epidem

    I have total RNA extracted from environmental samples that I intend to sequence. The main aim is to detect viral and bacterial transcripts.

    My lab has purchased the superscript complete gold epidemiology kit for this work. I realized that the protocol epibio/Illumina provide online ends at library QC. I'm confused what steps to follow after that. My questions are..

    1. Should I do library normalization or not, and if so, how do I approach this? (can the Nextera bead normalization approach be employed here too?)
    2. During library denaturation, should I use NaOH to mix with my libraries while combining heating at 96 for 2 min?

    Regards/
    dr_grm
  • cmbetts
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 120

    #2
    1) I'm not totally clear by what you mean by library normalization here, but since you reference the Nextera XT beads I'm assuming you mean standardizing the concentrations of multiple libraries so that you get even coverage from multiplexed samples. If so, the answer is yes, but it wouldn't require Nextera beads. They should be treated like a standard library, in which case you can use your preferred method of library quantification (Qubit, bioanalyzer, qPCR, etc.) to calculate the nM concentration of your libraries and then dilute them in 10mM Tris, 0.5% Tween-20 so that you can pool them in equal concentrations for sequencing.
    2) The library denaturation protocol is going to be determined by your sequencer. Just about every Illumina sequencer, and even kits for the same sequencer, has a slightly different library prep protocol that should be consulted for the run (Usually NaOH for 5min at RT, sometimes with a Tris quench before further dilution).

    Comment

    • dr_grm
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 5

      #3
      Hi cmbetts, thank you for your assistance. I have a follow up question. Assuming I have 8 samples I want to multiplex in one run, and I have normalized each sample to 4nM. Should I:
      1. Add 5ul of 0.2N NaOH to each sample and incubate for 5 min, then pool 5ul of each denatured sample into 1 tube. or
      2. Take 5ul of each sample and pool into 1 tube, then add 5ul of 0.2N NaOH to denature the pool?

      Thanks

      Comment

      • cmbetts
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 120

        #4
        The important thing is to not have any more library or NaOH than used when running a single library. The way that I typically do it is to mix an equal volume of the 4nM libraries together, just enough to accurately pipette, then take 5ul from that pool and treat it like it were a single library (add 5ul NaOH for 5min, then add the HT1 and do any remaining dilutions and/or PhiX additions). I've also seen people denature each library and add HT1 individually followed by mixing in equal volumes prior to loading, but I prefer the first way because it has fewer tubes and steps.

        Comment

        • dr_grm
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 5

          #5
          Once again, thanks alot cmbetts.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Today, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...