There are no conversations in this channel.
Please log in to your account to view your subscribed posts.
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27 responses
75,222 views
0 reactions
|
by suparmin
11-07-2016, 01:02 AM
|
|||
|
2 responses
2,028 views
0 reactions
|
by lordjonwald
02-25-2016, 05:40 AM
|
|||
|
5 responses
3,615 views
0 reactions
|
by Marta123
02-22-2016, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
4 responses
7,675 views
0 reactions
|
by salzberg
02-18-2016, 05:36 AM
|
|||
|
12 responses
20,186 views
0 reactions
|
by Sow
02-17-2016, 12:41 AM
|
|||
|
0 responses
1,162 views
0 reactions
|
02-16-2016, 10:18 AM
|
|||
|
6 responses
2,295 views
0 reactions
|
by tonup69
02-16-2016, 07:32 AM
|
|||
|
0 responses
2,044 views
0 reactions
|
by ya_jennifer
02-15-2016, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
14 responses
2,814 views
0 reactions
|
by GenoMax
02-15-2016, 10:10 AM
|
|||
|
3 responses
2,743 views
0 reactions
|
by Michael.Ante
02-15-2016, 05:09 AM
|
|||
|
2 responses
3,182 views
0 reactions
|
by Michael.Ante
02-12-2016, 12:16 AM
|
No topics found.
widgetinstance 229 (Webinars) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
-
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...Today, 05:17 AM -
Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
-
I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.
Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...