Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tefina
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 13

    library concentrations at various levels (RNA seq)

    Hi,

    I am interested in some library preparation details of RNA seq.
    Lets assume you deal with GA or HISeq.

    I am just interested in the following numbers:

    (1) Input Material:
    Usually people take 0.1 - 4 ug of total RNA (or, respectively, 100 ng of mRNA). So of what concentration in which volume are we talking about?


    (2) Library concentration after amplification (so after purification, fragmentation, first/second strand synthesis, ligation of adapters):
    10nM in 10uL .
    Would this be a good average estimate?

    (3) Library concentration after denaturation and dilution - so when loading it on the flowcell:
    7pM in 120uL / lane.
    Is this correct?

    I would be especially interested in some numbers regarding the TrueSeqProtocol from Illumina.

    Thanks a lot in advance,
    tefina
  • TonyBrooks
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 303

    #2
    Originally posted by Tefina View Post
    Hi,

    I am interested in some library preparation details of RNA seq.
    Lets assume you deal with GA or HISeq.

    I am just interested in the following numbers:

    (1) Input Material:
    Usually people take 0.1 - 4 ug of total RNA (or, respectively, 100 ng of mRNA). So of what concentration in which volume are we talking about?
    This is in the TruSeq protocol. You can start with 0.1-4µg of total RNA (in 50µL water) or 100ng of mRNA (in <5µL ). We generally start with total RNA towards the top of that range because most of the time RNA isn't limiting, however we produce buckets of library, so we think we could reduce the input if needed.

    Originally posted by Tefina View Post
    (2) Library concentration after amplification (so after purification, fragmentation, first/second strand synthesis, ligation of adapters):
    10nM in 10uL.

    Would this be a good average estimate?
    As I said before we generate a large amount of library (concentration is typically > 200nM in about 30µL. This is diluted down to 10nM for storage.

    Originally posted by Tefina View Post
    (3) Library concentration after denaturation and dilution - so when loading it on the flowcell:
    7pM in 120uL / lane.
    Is this correct?

    I would be especially interested in some numbers regarding the TrueSeqProtocol from Illumina.
    We load 12pM for TruSeq libraries on our GAIIx, but how much you load depends on what works for you and also depends on how you quantify your library.

    Comment

    • Tefina
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 13

      #3
      can you also tell me something about the concentration of the total RNA in the beginning? So assuming that each mRNA has an average length, can you tell me more or less the concentration (nM) in this 50µL?

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by Tefina View Post
        can you also tell me something about the concentration of the total RNA in the beginning? So assuming that each mRNA has an average length, can you tell me more or less the concentration (nM) in this 50µL?
        Rule of thumb: 1 ug of 1kb DNA is ~ 1 trilllion (10^12) molecules.

        Twice that for single stranded molecules.

        But, remember that total RNA is largely rRNA. I would guess the Illumina TruSeq RNA prep libraries yield about 1% polyA+ RNA. Maybe 10 ng per 1 ug of input. So, you are down to about 20 billion molecules.

        Then you fragment those molecules. This causes an increase in the number of fragments, but also a lot of those fragments are lost during purification.

        Call it a wash. Still at around 20 billion molecules. Then conversion to cDNA. You will lose at least half. 10 billion.

        So that is your library really. Sure you will almost certainly do enrichment amplification -- this can increase the number of molecules by >1000x.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          Originally posted by Tefina View Post
          can you also tell me something about the concentration of the total RNA in the beginning? So assuming that each mRNA has an average length, can you tell me more or less the concentration (nM) in this 50µL?
          RNA's vary in length so much that it's pointless to estimate a molarity. If you really wanted to, I guess you could do a back of an envelope calculation

          According to Ambion M.W. of ssRNA = (# nucleotides x 320.5) + 159.0

          Number of moles = Mass (g) / Molecular Weight
          Concentration (M) = Number of Moles / Litre

          Of which about 2% will be mRNA.

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by TonyBrooks View Post

            Of which about 2% will be mRNA.
            But depending on the organism and the tissue it might be 0.01% or 10%.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • TonyBrooks
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 303

              #7
              Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
              But depending on the organism and the tissue it might be 0.01% or 10%.

              --
              Phillip
              I said it was pointless

              Comment

              • Tefina
                Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 13

                #8
                ok, I see your point,
                thanks in any case!

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.

                  Probing...
                  Today, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                7 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...