Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lisa Jane Cross
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 4

    96 well fluorometer for genomic DNA quant?

    Hi there, we will soon be launching a high-throughput NGS service. We currently do all our genomic DNA quant on the Qubit (as we have had problems with the picogreen/LC480 quant). The Qubit however, really won't be suitable when our throughput rockets up.
    Any suggestions/suppliers of a 96-well fluorometer out there anywhere? I'm not having much luck finding one..they are all single tube
    Thanks!
  • Vinz
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 80

    #2
    There are probably more than you want to test:
    Biotek Synergy
    Tecan Infinite
    BMG labtech
    berthold
    Google plate reader fluorescence for more...

    Comment

    • TonyBrooks
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 303

      #3
      If you have a qPCR machine capable of end-point reading (alellic discriminiation), it may be worth investigating whether you can read Picogreen fluoresence on it.
      We have used our ABI 7900HT to read Picogreen plates, just set one marker to VIC and the other to SYBR with no (ROX) normalisation. The raw SYBR (I think) reads should be proportional to the mass of DNA in the sample. Just include a standard curve from the Lambda DNA, which is usually included in the Picogreen kit to determine the absolute amount.

      Comment

      • SarahNGS
        Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 17

        #4
        yes you want to look for a "fluorescence plate reader". PerkinElmer makes several including the EnSpire and Victor. They both work great for Pico Green.

        Comment

        • Ber7702
          Registered Vendor
          • Nov 2010
          • 15

          #5
          For cheap and cheerful look at the Molecular Devices F3 or F5 Filtermax plate readers. For expensive and funky looking, you could take a look at the Trinean DropSense. It's basically a 96 well plate version of the Nanodrop.

          Comment

          • Old guy
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 12

            #6
            I have access to a Synergy HT and about 2,000 samples to quantify. Any suggestions on a protocol? Whose picogreen do you use and what is the most used standard? Thanks

            Comment

            • SarahNGS
              Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 17

              #7
              Originally posted by Old guy View Post
              I have access to a Synergy HT and about 2,000 samples to quantify. Any suggestions on a protocol? Whose picogreen do you use and what is the most used standard? Thanks
              Invitrogen makes a PicoGreen kit containing a standard: http://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/...i8hAAAAA%3D%3D

              Also Promega makes the QuantiFluor system:

              which also contains a lambda DNA standard. I have not used this one myself but the price is lower than the Invitrogen kit.

              I've never used a synergy reader but basically you'd set up a standard curve then measure your fluorescence intensity against it. Depending on the reader, I've done either intensity vs. concentration as well as a log-log plot; use whichever gives you the straightest calibration curve. Ideally one does triplicate wells, but for 2000 samples that may be too much.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              10 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              13 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...