Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • firefly2280
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 28

    #1

    Low concentration DNA, quantity needed and any ideas?!

    Hi all

    I was wondering if anyone had any experience of low concentration DNA and if there was a method to improve extraction?

    I am currently taking environmental swabs of quite a small area (which can not be made larger) and doing a bead-beat and Qiagen column extraction.

    I am getting around 6ng/ul showing on a Nanodrop and nothing coming up on an endpoint 16S PCR

    I was wondering how much starting material you might need to be able to feed into the MiSeq?

    Thanks for your help!

    nikki
  • yaximik
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 199

    #2
    6 ng/ul is a pretty good amount, but Nanodrop is not the best method as aptical density can not discriminate between DNA and nucleotides, for example. I would use Nanodrop 3300, people use Qubit, or anything that is suitable for fluorescence. Once libraries are made, these can be carefully reamplified to load MiSeq properly.

    Comment

    • firefly2280
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 28

      #3
      Thanks, yes I know nanodrop isnt the best, it was just to get a rough idea.

      But you think this should be enough despite not seeing a band on a gel after an endpoint PCR?

      Comment

      • pbluescript
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 224

        #4
        I don't trust anything lower than about 10 ng/ul from a Nanodrop. You can put water on there and get a reading of 6ng/ul. You should use a fluorescent dye to quantify instead.

        Comment

        • protist
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 101

          #5
          Completely agree with pbluescript and in fact I personally would change that limit to 15-20 ng/uL. Nanodrop is good for 260/280 and 260/230 ratios but for accurate quantification at the lower 10 ng range you really should use Qubit or some other fluorescent based methodology.

          Comment

          • firefly2280
            Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 28

            #6
            thanks for all of your replies

            My main question really is what can I do to increase my yield of DNA as I clearly dont have enough?

            thanks

            Comment

            • HESmith
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 512

              #7
              Forget quantification. Given that PCR can detect even a single copy of template, my concern would be that you have virtually no DNA in your sample. I would recommend reviewing the literature for techniques appropriate for DNA isolation from small amounts of material. I'm fairly certain that beadbeater and Qiagen columns will not be at the top of the list...

              Comment

              • protist
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2009
                • 101

                #8
                Originally posted by firefly2280 View Post
                thanks for all of your replies

                My main question really is what can I do to increase my yield of DNA as I clearly dont have enough?

                thanks
                You don't say how much DNA you actually have or the total volume only the ng/uL There a several kits out there for low starting amounts eg Nextera which is recommended for MiSeq..

                Nextera XT kits from Illumina - libraries can be constructed from as little as 1 ng of starting material

                Nextera Kit Illumina/EpicentreBio - libraries from a 50 ng and up..

                Comment

                • protist
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 101

                  #9
                  Might be of help..

                  Comment

                  • pbluescript
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 224

                    #10
                    Originally posted by firefly2280 View Post
                    thanks for all of your replies

                    My main question really is what can I do to increase my yield of DNA as I clearly dont have enough?

                    thanks
                    I routinely work with small amounts of RNA and I had to abandon the use of columns for purification due to sample loss. Mostly, I use organic methods, precipitation, and Ampure beads for isolation and purification.

                    Comment

                    • rnaeye
                      Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 80

                      #11
                      Environmental samples may contain PCR inhibitors. If your A260 reading is coming from nucleic acids, it's good amount of DNA to do PCR. You can run ~10-20 ng DNA on a garose gel and confirm that you have DNA. To me your problem might be PCR inhibition.5-10 ng would be enough to make library.

                      Comment

                      • pmiguel
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 2328

                        #12
                        I am with Harold here. Nanodrop is not only useless at this concentration, it is likely to give you and incorrect result even at 10x this concentration. This is because genomic DNA preps generally will contain large amounts of RNA (more than the DNA in the prep.) So what is the point of checking absorbance at 260 nm as it does not distinguish between RNA and DNA?

                        This does not even get into other contaminants that frequently adulterate DNA preps. Run a gel or use a fluorimeter.

                        --
                        Phillip

                        Comment

                        • firefly2280
                          Member
                          • Oct 2012
                          • 28

                          #13
                          Thanks for your help all.

                          Nothing shows up on a gel, im quite sure there are inhibitors, which is why i wanted to use a column based extraction method. I might switch back to phenol chloroform if thats better, although when I compared it with a couple of kits and did a qPCR, my curves and replicates were much nicer with the qiagen.

                          I will check out the Nextera kits too and I have some picogreen to check my concentration.

                          Comment

                          Latest Articles

                          Collapse

                          • SEQadmin2
                            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                            by SEQadmin2



                            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                            ...
                            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                          • SEQadmin2
                            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                            by SEQadmin2


                            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                            ...
                            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                          • SEQadmin2
                            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                            by SEQadmin2



                            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                            ...
                            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

                          ad_right_rmr

                          Collapse

                          News

                          Collapse

                          Topics Statistics Last Post
                          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
                          0 responses
                          14 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                          0 responses
                          27 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                          0 responses
                          20 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                          0 responses
                          19 views
                          0 reactions
                          Last Post SEQadmin2  
                          Working...