Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anna_m
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 17

    Larger size TruSeq nano prep

    Hello,
    I followed the protocol for the 550bp size TruSeq nano library preparation but my final libraries were much larger than the expected 670bp average size (see attached pic).

    Has anyone else come across larger than expected libraries?
    Do you have any advice as to what may have happened?

    Thanks in advance,
    Anna.
    Attached Files
  • sweetph3
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 22

    #2
    I also saw a larger than expected product. I ran the Covaris to shear at 500 bp, and the final libraries had Bioanalyzer peaks at 780 bp. I don't have an explanation.

    Comment

    • barrmur
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 26

      #3
      Truseq pcr free libraries do run larger on a BA due to the tailed adapters but I have not seen this before with nano libraries. One explanation my be incomplete mixing of the size selection beads meaning that the incorrect amount of beads were added to the cleanup and a poor size selection. Might also be an idea to run the sheared samples on the BA before cleanup to check the size distribution from the shearing.

      Comment

      • anna_m
        Member
        • Jun 2013
        • 17

        #4
        Hello, I asked Illumina tech support and they said to try diluting the libraries as the chip looked to be overloaded. I made a 1 in 20 dilution and repeated the chip. An example of a trace is attached. The average size has gone down by around 100bp but it's still not the 670bp average stated in the manual. I have sent tech support these diluted library results and asked if they think they will sequence.

        Anna.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • jpmirandam
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 4

          #5
          I have the same problem. I make a change on the fragmentation protocol whit covaris (from a 550 pb insert to a 400 pb insert) but the mean size was almost the same (900 bp aprox.). I think that could be a problem on the size selection. Any help?. Thanks.

          Comment

          • anna_m
            Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 17

            #6
            Hello,
            It's a size selection issue. The protocol doesn't need to be altered, just make sure your SP beads are vortexed a lot (I mean a lot!). I usually mix them in between each sample prep as a pre-caution. Also we've found that the libraries run larger on the tapestation in comparison to the bioanalyser. Libraries usually look around 50bp larger on the tapestation. When the insert sizes are checked in the analysis stage, they are usually around the right size.

            All the best,
            Anna.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...