Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Francy87
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 28

    #1

    mRNA traces on Bioanalyzer

    I know it's a discussed argument, but I'd like to have an opinion about my Bioanalyzer traces.
    I extracted total bacterial RNA from food samples, then I used the Bacteria RiboZero kit to purify from rRNA. I don't know how my total RNA looked like before the RiboZero depletion, since I didn't run it on the BioAnalyzer, but after the rRNA depletion it looked like in the BA traces attached.

    The sequencing core said I can't go ahead with the library preparation… But I saw on the RiboZero website that after the purification, I should have only a peak at 100-140nt, that is what I have. I can't understand why my traces are different from what epicenter write on the website.
    Any comments about this? Does anyone has ever obtained libraries from this kind of mRNA?
    Attached Files
  • littlefairy
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 2

    #2
    Hi,
    Sorry I can not answer your questions
    Could you please tell me how to print the xad file to pdf like what you did.
    Thanks

    Comment

    • nucacidhunter
      Jafar Jabbari
      • Jan 2013
      • 1250

      #3
      Originally posted by littlefairy View Post
      Hi,
      Sorry I can not answer your questions
      Could you please tell me how to print the xad file to pdf like what you did.
      Thanks
      On Agilent 2100 Expert software go to File>print which will open a print dialogue box. In the box under “Save To File” section tick PDF box.

      Comment

      • littlefairy
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2013
        • 2

        #4
        That works well.
        Thanks a lot.
        Hopefully, you will solve the problem.
        By the way, my total prokaryotic RNA sample yesterday is of low RIN value, merely 6, which means RNA-seq could not be done on this samples.

        Comment

        • pmiguel
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 2328

          #5
          Originally posted by Francy87 View Post
          I know it's a discussed argument, but I'd like to have an opinion about my Bioanalyzer traces.
          I extracted total bacterial RNA from food samples, then I used the Bacteria RiboZero kit to purify from rRNA. I don't know how my total RNA looked like before the RiboZero depletion, since I didn't run it on the BioAnalyzer, but after the rRNA depletion it looked like in the BA traces attached.

          The sequencing core said I can't go ahead with the library preparation… But I saw on the RiboZero website that after the purification, I should have only a peak at 100-140nt, that is what I have. I can't understand why my traces are different from what epicenter write on the website.
          --
          Phillip
          Any comments about this? Does anyone has ever obtained libraries from this kind of mRNA?
          Pico chips are very sensitive. So the lack of any visible mRNA makes it seem like nearly all of your sample was lost and/or degraded during purification.

          Comment

          • kerplunk412
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2012
            • 119

            #6
            I agree that it looks like your RNA is degraded. It would be a good idea to check your samples on the BA (or by agarose gel) before starting the depletion to determine if the problem arose from your samples or the rRNA depletion process. It is always a good idea to assess the quality of your starting material before starting purification and library prep.

            If these are very precious samples you might still be able to make libraries from them, but you should probably skip fragmentation and possibly modify bead cleanup steps to retain smaller products.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            21 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...