Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JackieM
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 9

    #1

    Kapa vs NEBnext for ChIPSeq?

    Hi Seqanswers!
    Forgive me if there’s already a post on this (I saw a post comparing Truseq ChIP kit with NEBnext, but nothing on Kapa) but does anyone have any experience using a Kapa hyper or Kapa Whole Genome Library kit for ChIPSeq? I'll be preparing some ChIP libraries for sequencing on the Hiseq and I was thinking I could just start at end repair with my ChIP DNA, make my own primers and adapters, and adjust their concentrations to the lower input. I’ve had excellent luck with Kapa on whole genome long-insert libraries in the past, but have never started with anything less than a 250ng input of gDNA and would like to use about 5-10ng ChIP DNA for this application.

    Does anyone have a general preference between Kapa and NEB when it comes to things like reagent quality, workflow, helpfulness of tech support, etc…? I'm also curious as to how the efficiency of the ligation and amplification reactions in their library kits compare.


    Thanks! And I’ll make sure to update this with any info I get.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Originally posted by JackieM View Post

    Does anyone have a general preference between Kapa and NEB when it comes to things like reagent quality, workflow, helpfulness of tech support, etc…? I'm also curious as to how the efficiency of the ligation and amplification reactions in their library kits compare.
    A KAPA poster available in their site: ( http://www.kapabiosystems.com/produc...rep-kits/#docs) claims better performance of their Hyper kit in comparison with NEB Ultra low kit using various amount of sheared E coli DNA input. Their product brochure also has comparison of the kit with both NEB and TruSeq Nano kit. I think they would have credible data for their claim.
    I have been happy with NEB Techsupport, but I have not dealt with KAPA one.

    Comment

    • JackieM
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks for the info! That's very helpful!

      Comment

      • JackieM
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 9

        #4
        Update

        We decided to go with KAPA as it's what I'm familiar with, and it has been working beautifully. The kit even survived our freezer going down over a weekend! A previous colleague of mine- you guys may know him as the great Jon Keats- was convinced that they made the greatest ligase/PCR MM on the planet and I found he was generally right about most things NGS. With 10ng input, I'm able to go as low as 4-5 amp cycles (though 4 is really pushing it). I tested the NEBnext Ultra kit, but I over-amplified and we didn't end up sequencing any of the library, so it's hard to compare them directly.

        Both seem to be great kits, though. NEB has fantastic tech support (when you can get ahold of them) and they shipped me a kit to test for free. KAPA offered theirs for half price. The downside to using the KAPA kit is that you have to purchase your own, very expensive, adapters. (If you're calculating cost, remember that if you have them HPLC purified and annealed at IDT, you will not get anywhere near the yield that you specified. They may also take a few weeks to arrive.) I believe the KAPA kit is more expensive, so who knows, I may switch to NEB down the road.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...