Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IanAWarren
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 11

    Shearing digested DNA for RADseq

    Hello,

    I am making libraries for RADseq. I am trying out the Covaris ME220 for shearing the digested DNA. The shearing seems to be highly inefficient compared to what is given in the protocol book (using whole genomic DNA). Does anyone have any advice about ths in general?

    I have identified three possible problems:

    1) I am starting with digested DNA and I read somewhere that it does not shear as efficiently. The average size of my DNA should be 4096bp and I need to get it to ~500bp

    2) Since I am going from the digestion to the ligation and then the shearing directly I still have the old enzymes, buffer, and some rATPs in the mixture.

    3) I might be working with a low concentration of DNA, but I do not think this is right. I have about 1ug in 130ul, which is not low concentration to me.

    I am going to perform some trial and error and hopefully find a solution, but my initial efforts have proved ineffective. I think i was being too tentative.

    Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide
  • huguesparri
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 97

    #2
    Hello,

    Usually, we perform a AMPure XP purification step after the P1 ligation and we do not face any issue with the sonication. Maybe you should give it a try...

    H.

    Comment

    • kerplunk412
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 119

      #3
      I have Covaris digested DNA of 1-2 kb and it works well. I think your problem is #2.

      Comment

      • IanAWarren
        Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 11

        #4
        Hello,

        Thank you for your answers.

        What conditions did you use for your Covaris machine? We have not got close to the sizes we want (actually too small now) and we are fine tuning. We have just found that the conditions required are very different from what is given in the protocol book.

        I will suggest the purification too.

        Comment

        • huguesparri
          Member
          • May 2008
          • 97

          #5
          Usually we use a Bioruptor because it's located in our building.
          But we also have access to a S220 in the university. When we used it, the parameters were as follow:
          Volume: 130µl.
          DNA: 1 µg.
          sonication time: 60 sec.
          Duty Cycle : 10% , Intensity (Peak Incident Power), 5 (175), Cycles/Burst 200.

          Regards,

          H.

          PS:
          An answer from the IGF of Montpellier to the IGF of Lyon ^^

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            Today, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...