Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anjama
    Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 15

    Optimizing magnetic bead mix for gDNA extraction

    I've been working with the protocol in this thread for making magnetic bead mixes: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49507

    I have it working well as a substitute for Ampure/SPRIselect, but I've also been experimenting with it in gDNA extraction, and it seems to work well at a 0.5x bead to sample ratio, which essentially is clearing out everything ~600-700bp and lower. But now I'm trying to tweak it so that selects at least at 1000bp using a 1.0x ratio. This paper seems to accomplish this using 0.3M NaCl and 8% Peg solution: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2572261/

    So, I reduced the amount of the NaCl and Peg solutions for the protocol in my first so that the final mix is 0.3M NaCl and 8% Peg, and made up the difference with water. I ran two replicates for a variety of samples side-by-side on a single plate in a Kingfisher Flex, so they all were effectively handled identically. One replicate was the 0.5x ratio of SPRI mix, and the other was a 1.0x ratio using my new 0.3M NaCl/8% Peg mix. The first replicate worked perfectly, the second failed completely.

    The 0.3M NaCl seems really low, and I thought that maybe it was too low to precipitate the DNA, so based on a document I don't have a link to at the moment, I added NaCl to my mix to bring it up to 1M NaCl. This still didn't work.

    The protocol from my first link, which works, is 2.5M NaCl. Is my NaCl molarity in my new mix still too low? If so, then why are other protocols working with less? I understand that the NaCl precipitates the DNA, but I guess I don't understand what impact varying the molarity of the NaCl has on the final result; if anyone could enlighten me, I would appreciate it.
  • Carcharodon
    Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 40

    #2
    I might be stating the obvious here, but why not try 2.5M NaCl with 8% PEG? I can't explain why the other protocols seem to be working, but I really question whether it's necessary to reduce NaCl concentration so dramatically.

    Also, stupid question: when you say "final mix," you mean with the sample (DNA) already included, correct?
    Last edited by Carcharodon; 07-02-2017, 09:02 PM.

    Comment

    • ATϟGC
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 56

      #3
      I have always thought of the NaCl (or another source of Na+ like Sodium acetate) as a co-factor required for an ethanol, isopropanol or PEG-base nucleic acid precipitation. NaCl might precipitate nucleic acids to a degree but I do not think that it is nearly as efficient as alcohols of PEG.

      Comment

      • Carcharodon
        Member
        • Jul 2015
        • 40

        #4
        Originally posted by ATϟGC View Post
        I have always thought of the NaCl (or another source of Na+ like Sodium acetate) as a co-factor required for an ethanol, isopropanol or PEG-base nucleic acid precipitation. NaCl might precipitate nucleic acids to a degree but I do not think that it is nearly as efficient as alcohols of PEG.
        I think that the sodium ions, in this case, may be somehow facilitating the binding of DNA to the carboxylated surface of the beads rather than playing a large role in the actual precipitation.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          Today, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        41 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...