Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anjama
    Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 15

    Why would ligation fail with different isoschizomer?

    We're having a weird issue with trying to ligate Illumina adapters to DNA extracted from cattle egrets (a bird species). Doesn't matter if the DNA is extracted from blood or tissue. Initially, when we were learning how to do library preps a year ago, the DNA was digested with the EcoT22I enzyme, and it worked beautifully. However, we didn't have of the EcoT22I for the particular project involving cattle egrets, and the main source of it doesn't produce it anymore. So we resorted to purchasing different isoschizomers to try (NsiI and Mph1103I). They appeared to fragment the DNA, but the ligated DNA failed to amplify during the PCR stage. We went through a lot of troubleshooting to rule out different causes and couldn't find anything wrong. So we then tracked down a different source of EcoT22I, and it worked beautifully. So the question is, why might this be? Product pages for all three enzymes show the same methylation sensitivity, at least for the methylation sites listed. Is there something else about isoschizomers that could cause issues? Thanks
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Possible causes:
    1- Ligation was not successful which could be due to differences in RE buffer composition not being suitable for the ligase. This could happen if restriction reaction was not cleaned up and followed straight to ligation.
    2- RE inactivation differences which could result in RE activity during ligation and cut the ligated adapters.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...