Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SuzuBell
    Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 22

    #1

    Examining possible extraneous variables in RNA-sequencing data

    I have an RNA-sequencing dataset with 48 samples. I have a list of several possible extraneous variable values for each of the 48 samples. Some of these extraneous variables are categorical (lane1 versus lane2, performed on day 1 versus performed on day 2, performed in room 1 versus performed in room 2) and some are quantitative (ng/UL of RNA submitted for RNA-seq, RIN, % values, etc).

    The dataset contains two factors (one with 4 levels and one with 2 levels). Hence, there are 8 treatment groups, and there are 6 samples per treatment group. I did all 28 pairwise DEG analyses between the 8 treatment groups using edgeR, DESeq2, and limmaVoom, and all three methods revealed similar and disappointing results. Some treatment pairs had thousands of DEGs, and others had zero DEGs (even if that particular pair should have many in theory).

    I am trying to determine if these possible extraneous variables (both categorical and quantitative) may be causing issues. The MDS plots are not too good. Is there a recommended/reliable method for testing and/or accounting for extraneous variables (both categorical and quantitative) in RNA-sequencing DEG analysis? I am most familiar with edgeR, DESeq2, and limmaVoom, but am open to other software.

    Thank you for any advice!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...