Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nemis00
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 4

    #1

    Method for Identifying Adapters??

    I have been given Illumina paired end sequences for a chicken genome. I do not have access to the experiment protocol and the adapter files nor do I know which Illumina machine or sequencing adapters were used.

    I'd like to perform a de novo assembly but would like to trim adapters first, if they haven't been trimmed already. I know there are a few tools I can use to trim my paired end sequence files like FastqcMcf and Trimmomatic, but I need to have an adapter .fa file or know which adapters were used (TruSeq2, 3, etc). Also is there a way to get an updated adapter list for Illumina sequences? The Trimmomatic program that I just installed only has Nextera, TruSeq2 and 3 .fa files.

    How can I discover which adapter sequences were used?

    Thank you for your time.

    PS - I considered looking at overrepresented sequences reported by FastQC but I can only look for kmers of 5 to 10 nucleotides in length. Below is sample header from one line in my forward file...

    FASTQC had the following for Encoding:
    Encoding Sanger / Illumina 1.9

    @HWI-ST531R:257:H7R0WADXX:2:1101:1240:1994 1:N:0:GTGAAA
    CTCACTTTGCCATGTTTCTATTTGAACAGATGATAATTTTACCTTTTGGGTGAAAAATAAAATACGCCTCTCTTTGCACTCTGTTATTTGCCAAAGTAGAG
    +
    @CCFFFFFHHHHHIIJJJJIJJJJJJJJJJJIIIIHJIEHIIJJJJIJJJBFHIJJJDIIJJEGHJJJIIJJJHHHHHHFFFFDFCDEEEEEDDDD@CDDC
    Last edited by nemis00; 10-17-2015, 05:32 PM.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    All Illumina adapter sequences (legacy and current) has been described in Illumina Customer Sequence Letter:https://support.illumina.com/content...nce-letter.pdf

    Comment

    • nemis00
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 4

      #3
      Thank you. One of my searches led me to the link you provided. What I am looking for is a tool or method to detect adapters from my sequence information? Does such a tool exist?

      The link does not help.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        There are few software for trimming adapters. I hope bioinformaticians to provide a list and possibly recommend one for your particular application.

        Comment

        • nemis00
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2015
          • 4

          #5
          I mentioned that in my post. I have not been provided adapters. Instead of waiting an entire weekend, I am curious if there is a way to detect adapters. I'm sorry, you are not very helpful. But thank you for your time. I should have also added the tag "bioinformatics."

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            There are two options for preparing whole genome sequencing libraries for Illumina platforms. They either have used Nextera or TruSeq kits. Some reads in the library would be from short inserts (insert length shorter than read length) and therefore the 3’ end of read would contain adapter residues. You can search for partial Nextera adapter sequences (AGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG) and Truseq (CTCTTCCGATCT) in a subset of your reads to see which one has been used. If library has been prepared with another method you have to get that info from person preparing libraries.

            Comment

            • nemis00
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2015
              • 4

              #7
              There is only paired-end sequence information. It would be nice to have libraries with fragment sizes to work with, but is all shotgun sequence information without restriction enzyme treated libraries.

              On my original question:

              I think I found a tool worth trying - skewer.

              I'll map to a reference, although I'm not too happy with the reference yet, using bowtie2 and compare map percent of reads mapped for original sequences versus adapter removed sequences and compare coverages as well. Thank you for your efforts.

              Comment

              • gringer
                David Eccles (gringer)
                • May 2011
                • 845

                #8
                When we had this problem, we just tried different adapters with the first 100,000 reads of one sample, and picked the adapters that produced the greatest number of trimmed bases.

                Comment

                • GenoMax
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 7142

                  #9
                  Ideally you should have minimal adapter contamination if this is a good library.
                  BBMap includes a file with standard illumina adapter sequences in the "resources" directory. You can use multiple adapter files to scan with "bbduk.sh" (the trimming program in BBMap). While there you could look at "reformat.sh" section and see if you can use the method for detecting unknown primers/k-mers, if you expect non-standard adapters.

                  Comment

                  • Brian Bushnell
                    Super Moderator
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 2709

                    #10
                    If you have paired reads, and enough of the reads have inserts shorter than read length, you can identify adapter sequences with BBMerge, like this (they will be printed to adapters.fa):

                    bbmerge.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq outa=adapters.fa

                    But as GenoMax mentioned, normally, you can find the adapter sequence used in the adapters.fa file included with BBMap. In that case, you can do this:

                    bbduk.sh in1=r1.fq in2=r2.fq k=23 ref=adapters.fa stats=stats.txt

                    stats.txt will then list the names of adapter sequences found, and their frequency.

                    Comment

                    • WhatsOEver
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 215

                      #11
                      Just two small additions to GenoMax/Brians answers:

                      You may see significant adapter contaminations already in the fastqc report -> E.g. if you have a significant 5' adapter contamination, you will see the adapter sequence in the "Per base sequence content".

                      If using bbduk for adapter identification, keep in mind that you can also add non-standard adapters simply by adding them as fasta records to the adapters.fa.gz file in the resources folder. By reducing the k-mer size (k parameter) you may also look for partially trimmed adapters. It may sometimes also be of interest to allow 1 error in the k-mer matching (hdist parameter). Last but not least: You will probably obtain the best result if you subset your data (eg use the first 500k reads -> reads parameter) and play a little with the settings to get the highest precision.

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                        ...
                        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                        ...
                        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
                      0 responses
                      11 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                      0 responses
                      19 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                      0 responses
                      18 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                      0 responses
                      27 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...