Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • firefly2280
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 28

    #1

    Struggling to amplify DNA with barcoded primers

    Dear all

    I am using the MiSeq for 16S amplicon sequencing with custom barcodes.

    I use the barcoded primers on extracted genomic DNA. However, I have quite low concentrations of starting DNA, sometimes too low for a Qubit to detect. Some samples amplify well with the primers, some dont and some dont at all. It doesnt seem to relate to starting conc as sometimes the ones with undetectable levels amplify well.

    I know that there can be random fluctuations in priming efficiency with low conc DNA samples but I dont know how to get those ones that dont amplify to work....

    Ive tried touchdown PCR, enrichment PCR and varying annealing temps and template amount added but nothing works. When I do the PCR with the same primers minus the barcodes, they pretty much all work well.

    Can anyone help?

    Thanks
  • bnmtthws
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 4

    #2
    when we've had similar problems with a barcoded primer set i've simply performed two rounds of PCR - use the primers without barcodes first, and the reamplify with the barcoded primers.

    if you want to keep cycle numbers down, you should be able to get away with ~ 10-20 cycles for the first PCR and ~10-20 for the second depending on efficiency.

    Comment

    • firefly2280
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 28

      #3
      Thanks for your reply. I tried that and got nothing with the first primers after 10 cycles... Might have to give it another go. It works well with a full 30 cycles each but there's no way I want to do that!

      Comment

      • bnmtthws
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 4

        #4
        i hear you - good luck!

        at this point, i don't even bother running out the 1st PCR on a gel - we'll run the results of the 2nd pcr through the qubit and bioanalyzer to check sizing and concentration, and have had pretty good luck so far.

        another option is to remove half of the reaction after, say, 10 or 15 cycles and let the rest go to completion to run on a gel - this will give you confirmation that the reaction is 'working' but allow you to use the portion of the reaction that you removed as the template for the next round.

        Comment

        • firefly2280
          Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 28

          #5
          Thanks again, I'll have a play with it again. I dont see why I shouldnt be able to get it to work! At least I know Im not crazy and other people can make it work! Thanks

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...