Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dBlatt
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 1

    ddRAD library low concentration

    Greetings,

    I am making a ddRAD library and post-digest and cleanup my concentrations are very low. Since I have to standardize my DNA concentrations pre-PCR I would have to standardize at a very low mass of DNA (10ng per sample) to get the majority of my sequences standardized. If I am for a higher mass of DNA per sample (20ng) I won't be able to meet that level with the majority of my samples.

    My question is: is it is better to have more standardized samples at a low DNA mass or less standardized at a higher DNA mass?

    Thank you!
  • TKC
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 10

    #2
    I am somewhat new to ddRAD BUT- If it were me, I would aim for higher standardization. With less standardization, you further bias the composition of the final library, meaning higher loci dropped out due to low coverage across samples (although, depending on your application this may be more or less important to consider??)... And while there are other factors causing variation in the per-sample contribution of the final library I would think it best to minimize contributors wherever possible...

    In our lab, we typically use 100 ng total input per sample going into ligation (followed by pooling of samples, size selection, etc...), and generally only use 1/4 - 1/2 of the size-selected and pooled library for the PCR, and of this we generally have still more than needed for sequencing.

    I am trying a library prep now where I am in a similar position with very little DNA available per sample (~20 ng AFTER digestion and ampure cleanup), and will let you know how it goes (I'll know sometime next week- maybe someone else with experience will chime in), but I suspect that I will still have more than enough in the end. You could also add additional cycles to your PCR, but this comes with the cost of higher error, etc...

    Also, out of curiosity how much DNA did you have going into the digestion?
    Last edited by TKC; 04-08-2015, 06:01 PM.

    Comment

    • TKC
      Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 10

      #3
      Hi again,

      I just realized that the original post was fairly old (and, likely you have figured out your library prep issues?), but for completion's sake I'll add that even in my recent library prep with very low input DNA (~20 ng per sample after digestion + cleanup), we still have WAY more DNA than is necessary for submitting to the core facility, without adding PCR cycles.

      Comment

      • Gulzar Khan
        Junior Member
        • May 2016
        • 1

        #4
        I have the same problem of lower DNA quantity?

        Originally posted by TKC View Post
        Hi again,

        I just realized that the original post was fairly old (and, likely you have figured out your library prep issues?), but for completion's sake I'll add that even in my recent library prep with very low input DNA (~20 ng per sample after digestion + cleanup), we still have WAY more DNA than is necessary for submitting to the core facility, without adding PCR cycles.

        Can you please share the protocol. Thanks in advance.
        Gulzar Khan (Post Doc)
        Laboratorio de Diversidade Genetica e Evolucao,
        Departmento de Biologia,
        Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos,
        Campus Sorocaba, Brazil.
        +55-15-981859595.
        ISI: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-2730-2014.
        https://scholar.google.com.br/citati...AJ&hl=en&oi=ao
        https://www.researchgate.net/home

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...