Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IanAWarren
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 11

    Shearing digested DNA for RADseq

    Hello,

    I am making libraries for RADseq. I am trying out the Covaris ME220 for shearing the digested DNA. The shearing seems to be highly inefficient compared to what is given in the protocol book (using whole genomic DNA). Does anyone have any advice about ths in general?

    I have identified three possible problems:

    1) I am starting with digested DNA and I read somewhere that it does not shear as efficiently. The average size of my DNA should be 4096bp and I need to get it to ~500bp

    2) Since I am going from the digestion to the ligation and then the shearing directly I still have the old enzymes, buffer, and some rATPs in the mixture.

    3) I might be working with a low concentration of DNA, but I do not think this is right. I have about 1ug in 130ul, which is not low concentration to me.

    I am going to perform some trial and error and hopefully find a solution, but my initial efforts have proved ineffective. I think i was being too tentative.

    Thank you in advance for any help that you can provide
  • huguesparri
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 97

    #2
    Hello,

    Usually, we perform a AMPure XP purification step after the P1 ligation and we do not face any issue with the sonication. Maybe you should give it a try...

    H.

    Comment

    • kerplunk412
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 119

      #3
      I have Covaris digested DNA of 1-2 kb and it works well. I think your problem is #2.

      Comment

      • IanAWarren
        Member
        • Feb 2013
        • 11

        #4
        Hello,

        Thank you for your answers.

        What conditions did you use for your Covaris machine? We have not got close to the sizes we want (actually too small now) and we are fine tuning. We have just found that the conditions required are very different from what is given in the protocol book.

        I will suggest the purification too.

        Comment

        • huguesparri
          Member
          • May 2008
          • 97

          #5
          Usually we use a Bioruptor because it's located in our building.
          But we also have access to a S220 in the university. When we used it, the parameters were as follow:
          Volume: 130µl.
          DNA: 1 µg.
          sonication time: 60 sec.
          Duty Cycle : 10% , Intensity (Peak Incident Power), 5 (175), Cycles/Burst 200.

          Regards,

          H.

          PS:
          An answer from the IGF of Montpellier to the IGF of Lyon ^^

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...