Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BioGenomics
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 25

    ddRAD/GBS lib conc on HiSeq 3000/4000 ?

    Hi all,

    Has anybody any advice on the "best" concentration (pM) to load a ddRAD or GBS libraries on a HiSeq 3000/4000 ? ddRAD have 300-600 bp, while GBS more around 250-350 bp lib sizes. I know the longer fragments of ddRAD might create a problem may be with the new chemistry/patterned flowcells.

    Also 10% Phix would be ok ?

    Cheers,

    Greg
  • ATϟGC
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 56

    #2
    Hi,

    The optimal loading concentration and phiX % spike in will likely depend largely on the nucleotide sequence diversity at the start of your reads (on the HiSeq 2000 the first 12 bp is the most critical I think). Depending on how your ddRAD libraries were prepared they may be quite diverse (i.e. balanced proportions of each nucleotide at each position) or suffer from low sequence diversity. From what I read (http://support.illumina.com/sequenci...questions.html) the HiSeq 4000 still has low-diversity issues so it would be helpful if you could provide information as to how diverse the start of your reads are. A matrix of the nucleotide diversity for the first 12 bp like the one in the last post of the link below might help others give you recommendations.

    Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)


    After having some run failures last year due to supposed nucleotide diversity issues on a hiseq 2000, we nearly perfect runs by adding some staggered barcodes to break up the restriction site, included a 15% phiX spike in, and clustered at 600-700K/mm^2.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...