Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anjama
    Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 15

    #1

    Optimizing magnetic bead mix for gDNA extraction

    I've been working with the protocol in this thread for making magnetic bead mixes: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49507

    I have it working well as a substitute for Ampure/SPRIselect, but I've also been experimenting with it in gDNA extraction, and it seems to work well at a 0.5x bead to sample ratio, which essentially is clearing out everything ~600-700bp and lower. But now I'm trying to tweak it so that selects at least at 1000bp using a 1.0x ratio. This paper seems to accomplish this using 0.3M NaCl and 8% Peg solution: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2572261/

    So, I reduced the amount of the NaCl and Peg solutions for the protocol in my first so that the final mix is 0.3M NaCl and 8% Peg, and made up the difference with water. I ran two replicates for a variety of samples side-by-side on a single plate in a Kingfisher Flex, so they all were effectively handled identically. One replicate was the 0.5x ratio of SPRI mix, and the other was a 1.0x ratio using my new 0.3M NaCl/8% Peg mix. The first replicate worked perfectly, the second failed completely.

    The 0.3M NaCl seems really low, and I thought that maybe it was too low to precipitate the DNA, so based on a document I don't have a link to at the moment, I added NaCl to my mix to bring it up to 1M NaCl. This still didn't work.

    The protocol from my first link, which works, is 2.5M NaCl. Is my NaCl molarity in my new mix still too low? If so, then why are other protocols working with less? I understand that the NaCl precipitates the DNA, but I guess I don't understand what impact varying the molarity of the NaCl has on the final result; if anyone could enlighten me, I would appreciate it.
  • Carcharodon
    Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 40

    #2
    I might be stating the obvious here, but why not try 2.5M NaCl with 8% PEG? I can't explain why the other protocols seem to be working, but I really question whether it's necessary to reduce NaCl concentration so dramatically.

    Also, stupid question: when you say "final mix," you mean with the sample (DNA) already included, correct?
    Last edited by Carcharodon; 07-02-2017, 09:02 PM.

    Comment

    • ATϟGC
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 56

      #3
      I have always thought of the NaCl (or another source of Na+ like Sodium acetate) as a co-factor required for an ethanol, isopropanol or PEG-base nucleic acid precipitation. NaCl might precipitate nucleic acids to a degree but I do not think that it is nearly as efficient as alcohols of PEG.

      Comment

      • Carcharodon
        Member
        • Jul 2015
        • 40

        #4
        Originally posted by ATϟGC View Post
        I have always thought of the NaCl (or another source of Na+ like Sodium acetate) as a co-factor required for an ethanol, isopropanol or PEG-base nucleic acid precipitation. NaCl might precipitate nucleic acids to a degree but I do not think that it is nearly as efficient as alcohols of PEG.
        I think that the sodium ions, in this case, may be somehow facilitating the binding of DNA to the carboxylated surface of the beads rather than playing a large role in the actual precipitation.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...