Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frascom
    Junior Member
    • May 2019
    • 5

    NEB Fragmentase mitogenome advice

    Hi, I am currently working with mitogenome sequencing of small mammals. I have amplified 5 PCR amplicons of the mitogenome around 4-5kb fragment lengths. My next step is to pool fragments and conduct shearing using NEB Fragmentase before library prep. Does anyone have any recommendations of the timing of incubation to achieve around 200bp fragments? My plan is to conduct a time series trial to find the optimum time, however, I am wary that low concentration of PCR Fragments that after shearing I may no actually be able to visualize on an agarose gel to confirm fragment shearing size. Conc of fragments ranges from 5ng/ul - 250 ng/ul.

    Currently looking at end result using 300bp paired-end MiSeq kit for sequencing hence the 200bp fragment target.

    But I am interested to know peoples experiences or recommendations to consider.

    thanks for the help
    Last edited by frascom; 06-07-2019, 07:26 AM.
  • Anmar06
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2020
    • 7

    #2
    Similar predicament

    Hi!

    Im having similar issues and I was hoping you could tell me if you worked something out in relation to this?
    Im currently attempting to sequence 200bp fragments, most of my results have these very small dimers leftover after fragmentation and I was hoping to reduce these in future fragmentase reactions. But when I run a gel with my fragmented samples I get no bands, just smears.

    Comment

    • frascom
      Junior Member
      • May 2019
      • 5

      #3
      I would expect smears as you have randomly sheared the DNA by cutting at the restriction enzyme sites so you will have many different sizes of DNA.

      Comment

      • Anmar06
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2020
        • 7

        #4
        Definitely. I don't expect to find bands but I do expect to find a more homogeneous/concentrated smear (?). Im attempting to carry out the exploration shown in the NEB product information area (https://bit.ly/3lw2yo6) but, probably due to the size I am trying to get to, I never get well defined smears. I mainly hope to do this to standardise my protocol: after sequencing my reads range between 1kb and 50bp, many concentrated at 50bp. I worry the 50bp fragments are left-over adaptors so I have been attempting to see if they could potentially be fragmentase residues. I don't have much bioinformatic experience so I haven't attempted to check the 50bp reads themselves. Nevertheless, thanks for your reply.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          Yesterday, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        52 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        110 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...