Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ETBA
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2018
    • 3

    Sequencing Human/Mouse ATAC libraries together?

    Hi all,

    I am a novice to this and currently preparing mouse and human ATAC libraries. All samples are on different barcodes and we want to compare these samples, so we think it's better to sequence (100 bp, paired end, HiSeq-X-Ten) everything together to get similar depth across all and reduce batch effects.

    I'm unsure if this is a problem for the sequencer or for the analysis too? After read-trimming and FastQC check, when I go to align the samples with BWA-MEM or Bowtie2 for example, could I run one analysis and select for aligned human and mouse reads or do two separate runs targeted to 1 species to separate them out?

    Any help / suggestions are much appreciated.

    Thanks, Eric
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    As long as you use unique indexes for all samples (dual indexes would be best), QC and then balance the libraries in the pool so the contents are more or less uniform, you can mix and sequence these together. Post-run demultiplexing will separate all of your samples into independent files on a per sample basis.

    Comment

    • ETBA
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2018
      • 3

      #3
      That's great, thanks for the information. Just to be safe, i'm assuming that the dual indexes are also the oligos specified in Buenrostro, 2013?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Unique dual indexes are used in library prep. See this.

        Comment

        • ETBA
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2018
          • 3

          #5
          Brilliant that was very helpful. Although a bit of shame as many samples are already done on a single indexing strategy with i7 so i'll have to stick with that. I'll certainly consider the use of a dual indexing strategy next time.
          Thanks again!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...