Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marcela Uliano
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 19

    #1

    Sophie's choice: Random mate-pairs or gel selection in Illumina?

    Hi guys!

    I'm sequencing and assembling a de novo invertebrate genome of about 0,8Gb. I want to make a lane run of Illumina nextera mate-pairs, but I'm having some difficulty on selecting the size of the mate-pairs.

    I saw that for de novo genomes is better if you have mate-pair-known sizes. So I was planning on doing 5kb and 10kb gel-size selection. However, the standard Illumina procedure is to make a random library of inserts ranging from 2kb to 15kb.

    I was wondering how much bias it would insert for the de novo algoritm, lets say, allPaths, to assemble it? Does anyone of you have experience with that?

    I don't know if I insist on trying to have the mate-pair with known insert size or if I just go for the random mate-pair library preparation (I have plenty of pair-ends already).

    Any experinces you have, or papers to share, would help a lot! Thank you so much!
    Last edited by Marcela Uliano; 01-08-2015, 07:35 AM.
  • svitlana
    Member
    • Jun 2017
    • 16

    #2
    Hello Marcela,

    I need the same information for my assembly. Did you finally find something about it?

    Thank you in advance

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2




      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
      Yesterday, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    29 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    71 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...