Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    #1

    Sanger publishes amplification-free Illumina library prep paper

    Pretty interesting paper from Sanger. Link here.

    Looks like they basically add the flow cell primer portion to the standard Y-adapter to enrich directly on the flow cell, eliminating the PCR step and some bias.

    GenomeWeb discusses it a bit here.


    ****************************************************
    Nature Methods
    Published online: 15 March 2009 | doi:10.1038/nmeth.1311

    Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of (G+C)-biased genomes

    Iwanka Kozarewa1,2, Zemin Ning1,2, Michael A Quail1, Mandy J Sanders1, Matthew Berriman1 & Daniel J Turner1

    Abstract

    Amplification artifacts introduced during library preparation for the Illumina Genome Analyzer increase the likelihood that an appreciable proportion of these sequences will be duplicates and cause an uneven distribution of read coverage across the targeted sequencing regions. As a consequence, these unfavorable features result in difficulties in genome assembly and variation analysis from the short reads, particularly when the sequences are from genomes with base compositions at the extremes of high or low G+C content. Here we present an amplification-free method of library preparation, in which the cluster amplification step, rather than the PCR, enriches for fully ligated template strands, reducing the incidence of duplicate sequences, improving read mapping and single nucleotide polymorphism calling and aiding de novo assembly. We illustrate this by generating and analyzing DNA sequences from extremely (G+C)-poor (Plasmodium falciparum), (G+C)-neutral (Escherichia coli) and (G+C)-rich (Bordetella pertussis) genomes.
  • greigite
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 145

    #2
    library quantification

    I'm curious how necessary it is to use their qPCR method versus a Bioanalyzer for quantification of the no-PCR libraries. Since I'm just getting started with Illumina sequencing I don't have already sequenced libraries hanging around that I can use as qPCR standards, so the barrier to setting up this method is somewhat high. Could I still get useful results with Bioanalyzer quantification of the no-PCR libraries?

    Comment

    • ewilbanks
      Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 83

      #3
      From what I understand, the qPCR step is necessary to make sure you have enough adapters ligated sequence, with both adapters (so it can amplify in the flow cell).

      If you just look at total [DNA] I don't think you can tell this, since it will include those sequences with only 1 or no adapters. Maybe you could ask around to find people that have known standards!

      Comment

      • btarrier
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 3

        #4
        qPCR without library standards

        Originally posted by greigite View Post
        I'm curious how necessary it is to use their qPCR method versus a Bioanalyzer for quantification of the no-PCR libraries. Since I'm just getting started with Illumina sequencing I don't have already sequenced libraries hanging around that I can use as qPCR standards, so the barrier to setting up this method is somewhat high. Could I still get useful results with Bioanalyzer quantification of the no-PCR libraries?

        One way to do qPCR without library standards is to use the Illumina supplied PhiX library, which is at a known 10nM and should behave the same from qPCR run to run. Once you make dilutions of this library you can use them for multiple quantifications.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...