Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mimi_lupton
    Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 19

    Insert size for paired end sequencing for identification of structural variation

    Dear all,
    Does anyone have any experience of the ideal fragment size for paired end sequencing looking at structural variation in whole genome sequencing?

    I am doing a pilot project to whole genome sequence a single individual per lane. It may be the best strategy to choose a small size of 200bp and then run the same sample again using mate pair sequencing and much larger insert size of 2kb. This way we would achieve the optimum trade off between detection and resolution of break points, as outlined in the following paper;

    Designing deep sequencing experiments: detecting structural variation and estimating transcript abundance.
    Bashir A, Bansal V, Bafna V.


    Just doing paired end 75bp sequencing. Using the GAII the insert size can be 200-500bp. depending on how well the sequencing works and funding etc I may not get to do the mate pair part, so will just end up with the shorter fragment paired end data. With this in mind it might be better to go larger than 200bp and aim for 500bp. Does anyone have any experience of using this fragment size? It is ideal to aim for below 500bp, as this is the maximum length for cluster generation. If there are some reads over 500bp I guess they would reduce cluster efficiency?

    Any comments on this would be really appreciated.

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...